شناخت شرایط مؤثر محیطی در ارزیابی عملکرد وزیر علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و مدیریت، دانشگاه امام صادق علیه السلام، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: ارزیابی عملکرد -در هر سطحی از سازمان- تحت تأثیر برخی عوامل مؤثر محیطی است که به آن‌ها معمولاً کمتر توجه می‌شود. پس شناخت این شرایط، توجه به آن‌ها و تلاش برای خنثی‌سازی آن‌ها باعث افزایش صحت و دقت نتایج ارزیابی می‌شود. بنابراین، نظر به اهمیت ارزیابی عملکرد در مراتب بالای مدیریت دولتی، این پژوهش با انتخاب وزیر علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری به‌منزله مورد مطالعه، شناخت شرایط مؤثر محیطی در ارزیابی عملکرد وی را هدف خود قرار داد.
روش پژوهش: تحلیل مضمونی، روش تشخیص و تحلیل الگوها در داده‌های کیفی است که با آن، داده‌های کیفی، تقسیم، طبقه‌بندی، تلخیص و بازسازی می‌شود. تحلیل مضمونی، اساساً راهبردی توصیفی است که جست‌وجوی الگوها را از درون مجموعه داده‌های کیفی، تسهیل می‌کند.
یافته‌ها: مضمون‌های فراگیر و سازمان‌دهنده پژوهش بدین شرح است: الف- شرایط سیاسی شامل سیاست‌زدگی، اعمال نفوذ مقامات و نهادها و ثبات جایگاه، ب- ساختار شامل ساختار وزارتخانه، ساختار دولت و ساختار نظام، ج- انتصابات شامل تیم مدیریتی و هماهنگی میان آنها، د- شرایط حقوقی/ اداری شامل فقدان اختیارات و فقدان نظام پرورش وزیران، هـ وجهه عمومی شامل مقبولیت و شهرت، و- جامعه شامل مطالبات نابه‌جا و شرایط فرهنگی-اجتماعی-اقتصادی، و ز- شرایط بین‌الملل شامل تحریم و سیاست‌های بین‌الملل.
نتیجه‌گیری: با عنایت به اهمیت ارزیابی عملکرد وزیر علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری و لزوم افزایش روایی و پایایی نتایج آن، پیشنهاد می‌شود هنگام ارزیابی عملکرد وی، تلاش شود آثار شرایط محیطی به‌دست‌آمده در پژوهش حاضر، خنثی شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Understanding the Effective Environmental Conditions on the Performance Evaluation of Iranian Minister of Science, Research and Technology

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Mohammad Reza Seyedi 1
  • Hassan Danaeefard 2
  • Asadollah Ganjali 3
1 Ph.D. in Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor in Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran,
3 Associate Professor in Commercial Management Department, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: Performance evaluation -at any level of organization- is influenced by some environmental factors that are usually less considered. Therefore, recognizing these conditions, paying attention to them and trying to neutralize them will increase the accuracy and precision of the evaluation results. Therefore, considering the importance of performance evaluation in high levels of public administration, this study selected Iranian Minister of Science, Research and Technology as a case study to identify the effective environmental conditions in evaluating his performance.
Methods: Thematic analysis is a method for identifying and analyzing patterns in qualitative data, by which qualitative data is divided, classified, summarized and reconstructed. Thematic analysis is essentially a descriptive strategy that facilitates the search for patterns within qualitative data sets.
Results: The global and organizing themes of the research are as follows: a. Political conditions including politicization, influence of officials and institutions, and stability of position, b. Structure including ministry structure, government structure and system structure, c. Appointments, d. Legal / administrative conditions including lack of authority, and lack of a system for training ministers, e. Public image including acceptance, and reputation, f. society including inappropriate demands, and cultural-social-economic conditions, and g. international conditions including sanctions and international policies.
Conclusion: Considering the importance of performance evaluation of Minister of Science, Research and Technology and the need to increase the validity and reliability of its results, it is suggested that during evaluation, efforts be made to neutralize the effects of environmental conditions obtained in the present study.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Performance Evaluation
  • Environmental Conditions
  • Minister of Science
  • Research and Technology
  • Thematic Analysis

مراجع

Ahmady, Gholamali, Mehrpour, Maryam & Nikooravesh, Aghdas (2016). Organizational Structure. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 455-462.
Andeweg, Rudy B. (2014). Cabinet Ministers: Leaders, Team Players, Followers?, pp. 532-547. In R. A. W. Rhodes & Paul 't Hart (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
Azari, Alireza & Zamani Mazdeh, Mahdi (2015). A Strategic Model of Organization Performance Management. Tehran: Educational and Research Institute of Defense Industries.
Babaei Ebrahimabadi, M., Radfar, R., & Toloei Eshlaghy, A. (2019). Knowledge Management in Railway Industry: A Conceptual Model based on Open Innovation and Online Communities. IJRARE, 6(1), 63-72.
Being an Effective Minister (2015). UK: Institute for Government. Accessible at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/election-2015/being-effective-minister
Buller, Jim, & James, Toby S. (2015). Integrating Structural Context into the Assessment of Political Leadership: Philosophical Realism, Gordon Brown and the Great Financial Crisis. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(1), 77-96.
Byrne, Chris, Randall, Nick, & Theakston, Kevin (2015). Evaluating British prime ministerial performance: David Cameron in political time. Accessible at: https://igs.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/kevin_theakston.pdf
Byrne, Chris, Randall, Nick, & Theakston, Kevin (2017). Evaluating British Prime Ministerial Performance: David Cameron’s Premiership in Political Time. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(1), 202-220.
Cambridge Dictionary (2023). Cambridge University Press.
Cheong, J. (2009). Suggested Capacities for Minister's Success: An Empirical Approach based on Saaty's AHP. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(2), 136-151.
Cleary, H., & Reeves, R. (2009). The ‘Culture of Churn’ for UK Ministers and the Price We All Pay. DEMOS research briefing. Accessible at: https://www.demos.co.uk/files/Ministerial_Churn.pdf
Conceptual Note (2012). pp. 10-21. In National Evaluation Capacities: Proceedings from the Second International Conference, 12–14 September 2011, USA: UNDP.
Creating an Effective Ministerial Team: Ministers and Their Special Advisers (2012). UK: London: The Institute for Government.
Creswell, John W. (2012). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Translation by Hassan Danaeefard & Ali Salehi. Tehran: MehrabanNashr. (In Persian).
Danaeefard, H., Sadeghi, M., Mostafazadeh, M. (2015). Exploring and Analyzing the Consequences of Politicization of the Bureaucracy in Political Systems. Strategic Management Thought, 9(2), 57-86.
Drabble, S. (2011). Ministerial Effectiveness: Literature Review; A Summary Review of the Literature. UK: London: Institute for Government.
Elgie, Robert (2014). Understanding Prime-ministerial Performance: Comparative Perspectives. West European Politics, 37(5), 1187-1188.
Gill, Roger (2009). Leadership in the Public Sector – Is It Different? Herefordshire: Research Focus: The Leadership Trust.
Given, Lisa. M. (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. US: CA: Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Gruhn, Zoe (2010). Taking the Helm: Thoughts for Secretaries of State Taking Over a Department. England: Institute for Government.
Gruhn, Zoe, & Slater, Felicity (2012). Special Advisers and Ministerial Effectiveness. England: Institute for Government.
Hadizade Moghadam, Akram, Amirkhani, Tayebe, & Abdolmaleki, Maryam (2016). Studying the Impact of Organizational Reputation on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 25(81), 151-169. (In Persian).
Hassanpoor, J. & Dehyadegari, M. (2009). Morality and Politics from Critical Theory Point of View. Political and International Researches, 1(2), 107-138. (In Persian).
Jung, Kwangho, Moon, M. Jae, & Hahm, Sung Deuk (2008). Exploring the Linkage Between Ministerial Leadership and Performance in Korea. Administration & Society, 40(7), 667-690.
Keman, Hans (2010). Structure of Government, pp. 159-195. In Masashi Sekiguchi (Ed.), Government and Politics – Vol. I. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers/ UNESCO.
Kocijan, Bojana (2014). "Mindset Matters" Understanding Prime Ministers' Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. PhD Thesis. Budapest: Hungary: Central European University.
Kwiatkowski, Richard (2012). Politicians and Power: MPs in the UK Parliament, pp. 39-58. In A. Weinberg (Ed.), The Psychology of Politicians. UK: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laughrin, David (2009). Swimming for Their Lives - Waving or Drowning? A Review of the Evidence of Ministerial Overload and of Potential Remedies for It. The Political Quarterly, 80 (3), 339-350.
Lee, Sam Youl, Moon, M. Jae, & Hahm, Sung Deuk (2010). Dual Faces of Ministerial Leadership in South Korea: Does Political Responsiveness or Administrative Responsibility Enhance Perceived Ministerial Performance?. Administration & Society, 42(1), 77-101.
Mertens, Donna M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. London: SAGE Publications.
Na’ami, Abdollah, & Gholampoor, Asadollah (2017). Investigating Factor Structure of Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, Organizational Reputation and Performance in Enterprises (Case study: Bank Shahr). IUESA, 5(17), 1-12. (In Persian).
Nwanisobi, Beluchi C. & Christopher, Inienger Chia (2020). Definition of Public Administration: Various Scholars. American International Journal of Business Management (AIJBM), 3 (9), 56-61.
Oxford Learner's Dictionaries (2022). Oxford University Press.
Paighami, A. & Sajadieh, A., (2015). The Requirements and Major Scientific Policies in the Field of Justice Research from the Viewpoint of Iran’s Supreme Leader. Strategic Management Thought, 8(2), 5-34. (In Persian).
Poister, Theodore H., Aristigueta, Maria P., & Hall, Jeremy L. (2015). Managing and Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations; An Integrated Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pourezzat, Aliasghar (2015). Management through Performance Evaluation to Guide Progress of Society. Tehran: Progress Model. (In Persian).
Pourezzat, Aliasghar, & Seyyed Rezaei, Mir Yaghoub (2017). Performance Evaluation of Government and Administration. Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian).
Rahmdel, M. (2010). Analytical Investigation of Influence by Government Officials and its Relationship with Financial Corruption of Employees. International Legal Research, 3(5, 6 & 7), 52-68. (In Persian).
Rasouli, Reza, & Salehi, Ali (2016). Advanced Human Resources Management. Tehran: Paiam-e Noor University. (In Persian).
Rhodes, R. A. W., & Tiernan, Anne (2013). Organizational Capacity and Prime Ministerial Effectiveness: Observations from Australia. 63rd PSA Annual Conference, ‘The Party’s Over?’. 25-27 March 2013, City Hall, Cardiff.
Riddell, Peter (2013). Ministers and Mandarins; How Civil Servants and Politicians Can Work Better Together. England: Institute for Government.
Riddell, Peter, Gruhn, Zoe & Carolan, Liz (2011a). The challenge of Being a Minister: Defining and Developing Ministerial Effectiveness. UK: Institute for Government.
Riddell, Peter, Gruhn, Zoe & Carolan, Liz (2011b). The Challenge of Being a Minister: Summary and Recommendations Paper. UK: Institute for Government.
Robbins, Stephen P. & Judge, Timothy A. (2013). Organizational Behavior. NY: Pearson.
Sadeghi, M., Danaeefard, H. & Mostafazadeh, M. (2017). Understanding Bureaucracy Politicization: A Comparative Study of Quality, Processes and Consequences in Public Administration. Strategic Research of Politics, 6(22), 98-115.
Sarip, M. (2019). Improving Arabic Speaking Learning through Content and Language Integrated Learning Approach in PSPBA FBS UNJ. Journal International Seminar on Languages, Literature, Arts, and Education (ISLLAE), 1(1), 131-137.
Schofield, Carina Paine (2008). Key Challenges Facing Public Sector Leaders: Themes from the Ashridge Public Leadership Centre Essay Competition 2007. The Ashridge Journal. Accessible at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/428f/7039eff96ac492e7e789b1f95987ebbf02cc.pdf
Stahl, Michael M. (2022). The Promise of Public Service: Ideas and Examples for Effective Service. NY: Routledge. Chapter 5.
Stansfield, Annette (2016). Clear Purpose or Sheer Survival? National Ministerial Leadership across Multiple Arenas. American Review of Public Administration, 46(4), 478-498.
't Hart, Paul, & Schelfhout, David (2016). Assessing Prime-ministerial Performance in a Multiparty Democracy: The Dutch Case. Acta Politica, 51(2), 153-172.
Talbot, Colin (2010). Theories of Performance; Organizational and Service Improvement in the Public Domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Theakston, Kevin (2013). Evaluating Prime-ministerial Performance: The British Experience, pp. 221-242. In Paul Strangio, Paul 't Hart, & James Walter (Eds.), Understanding Prime-Ministerial Performance: Comparative Perspectives, Oxford University Press.
UKEssays. (November 2018). An Evaluation of Performance Appraisal. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/employment/an-evaluation-of-performance-appraisal.php?vref=1.
Walter, James (2013). Personal Style, Institutional Setting and Historical Opportunity: Prime-ministerial Performance in Context, pp. 33-56. In Paul Strangio, Paul ‘t Hart, & James Walter (Eds.), Understanding Prime-Ministerial Performance; Comparative Perspectives. London: Oxford.
Wang, XiaoHu (2009). Performance Analysis for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. London: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Wang, XiaoHu (2014). Performance Analysis for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Translation by Mahdi Kazemi & AlirezaNaghavi Hosseini. Tehran: Saffar. (In Persian).
Yavari, V., & Zahedi, S. (2013). Organizational Performance Management for Public and Non-profit Sectors; A Conceptual Model. Strategic Management Thought, 7(1), 79-122. (In Persian).
Zahraini & Situmorang, B. (2018). Model of Education Quality Management of Traditional Islamic Boarding Schools in Aceh, pp. 685-687. In Wadim Striełkowski & Jiuqing Cheng (Eds.), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Volume 200: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018), Medan City, Indonesia. Paris: Atlantis Press.
نامه آموزش عالی
دوره 15، شماره 60
دی 1401
صفحه 29-56

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار