طراحی و اعتبار یابی مدل "رهبری نوکیش" در مدیریت مراکز آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

3 استادیارگروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی و اعتبار یابی مدل "رهبری نوکیش" در مدیریت مراکز آموزش عالی بود
روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش حاضر،  به لحاظ هدف کاربردی  و به لحاظ شیوه اجرا ،  با رویکرد ترکیبی( کمی-کیفی) می باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش در بخش کیفی مدیران مراکز آموز عالی در استان­های غربی ایران می­باشد. که با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند تعداد 15 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. در بخش کمی جامعه آماری شامل اعضای هیات علمی  مراکز آموز عالی در استان­های غربی ایران( کرمانشاه، کردستان، همدان و ایلام)  بود، و  تعداد 335نفر  به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در  بخش کیفی مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود.  در بخش کیفی کدگذاری داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار MAXQDA انجام گردید و در بخش کمی برازش مدل با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی تاییدی و نرم افزارPLS انجام شد
یافته‌ها: یافته های تحقیق با استفاده از فرایند کد گذاری مصاحبه های انجام شده نشان داد که 15 مقوله اصلی و 46 مقوله فرعی ا بنیادی برای تبیین الگوی رهبری نوکیش در مدیریت مراکز آموزش عالی  شناسایی شد همچنین مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری و روش حداقل مربعات جزئی نشان از تأیید برازش مدل مذکور دارد. 
نتیجه‌گیری: با طراحی مدل رهبری نوکیش در مدیریت مراکز آموزش عالی، رهبران نظام آموزش عالی که بصورت هدفمند و نظام یافته خواهان ورود به مسیر نوآوری و  تحولات علمی هستند،  می­توانند حرکت خود را با چوب خط راهنمای پیشنهادی در این پژوهش آغاز نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Validating the "Convert Leadership" Model in the Management of Higher Education Centers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farhad Heidari 1
  • Faranak Mousavi 2
  • Maryam Eslampanah 3
  • Elham Kaveani 3
1 PhD Student in Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Sciences Education, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The aim of the current research was to design and validate the model of "innovative leadership" in the management of higher education centers
Methods: The method of the present research was with a mixed (quantitative-qualitative) approach. The statistical population of the research in the qualitative part is the managers of higher education centers in the western provinces of Iran 15 people were selected as a statistical sample using the purposeful sampling method. In the quantitative part, the statistical population included faculty members of higher education centers in the western provinces of Iran. In the current research, 335 people were selected as a statistical sample. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative part and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part. In the qualitative part, data coding was done using MAXQDA software, and in the quantitative part, model fitting was done using confirmatory factor analysis and PLS software
Results: The results of the research using the coding process of the conducted interviews showed that 15 main categories and 46 sub-categories of these categories were identified as 46 fundamental categories to explain the new leadership model in the management of higher education centers, as well as structural equation modeling and the minimum method. Partial squares indicate the confirmation of the fit of the mentioned model.
Conclusion: with design and validate the model of "innovative leadership" in the management of higher education centers, management of higher education system who want to enter the path of innovation in a targeted and systematic way can start their movement within the  framework of the proposed guide of this reaserch.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: convert leadership
  • higher education
  • digital age

References

Ancarani, A., & Di Mauro, C. (2018). Successful digital transformations need a focus on the individual. In Digitalisierung im Einkauf (pp. 11-26). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Araste, Hamidreza; Ibrahim's Nooh, A.Abbasian, H.Khabareh, K (2018). Presenting the digital university model. Iranian Higher Education Quarterly. 11(4).36-1-
Bagheri Majd, R. ; Sedghi Bukani, N. (2016) Designing the e-learning preparation model in the educational system of the Islamic Azad University of Mahabad. Information and communication technology in educational sciences. 7(4). 149-172
Brown, N., & Brown, I. (2019). From digital business strategy to digital transformatio– A systematic literature review. SAISIT ‘19: Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351108.3351122
Butschan, J., Heidenreich, S., Weber, B., & Kraemer, T. (2019). Tackling hurdles to digital transformation—The role of competencies for successful industrial internet of things (IIoT) implementation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(04), 1950036.
Carvalho, Luísa Cagica, and Maria José Madeira. 2021. Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship—Introduction. Administrative Sciences 11: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci
Chawinga WD. (2016)Teaching and learning 24/7 using Twitter in a university classroom: Experiences from a developing country. E-learning and Digital Media. 2016; 13 (1–2): 45–61
Ebrahimi, M. ; Soleimani, N. Shafizadeh, H. (2019). Presenting a model for decentralized management in education based on foundational data theory. Quarterly research in educational systems. 14 (special letter). 269-255
Gustafson, B. (2015)What is innovation? Retrieved from https://adjusting course.wordpress.com/2015/01/20/whatis- innovation- http://www.k-12 leadership. org 4-dimensions-of-instructional-leadership,2015
Javanmardi, Sh. Abbaspour, A. Khorsandi, A.  Ghiashi Nadushan, S.(2017) Designing the model of innovative university in the framework of innovation ecosystem in Iran. Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Higher Education of Iran. 10(4). 137-170
Jedaman, P., Buaraphan, K., Pimvichai, J., Yuenyong, C., & Jeerasombat, S. (2019). Educational management in transition of science: Policies and strategic leaders for sustainable education 4.0 in the 21st century science classroom. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2081(1), 22-32.
Johnston. B, MacNeill.Sh, Smyth. K. (2018). Digital Education and Learning: Conceptualising the Digital University the Intersection of Policy, Pedagogy and Practice. Springer.
Khalid J, Ram BR, Soliman M, Ali AJ, Khaleel M, Islam MS. Promising digital university: a pivotal need for higher education transformation. International Journal of Management in Education. 2018;12(3):264-275.
Kim HJ, Hong AJ, Song HD. The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019;16(1):1-8.
Malekzadeh, Gh.Sadeghi, S. (2016). Human resource management strategy in the digital age by relying on big data. Growth technology. 13(51). 9-1
Mohamed Adel,H. Aly Zeinhom. GH .  Abulsaoud. R Younis. A(2021) From university social-responsibility to social-innovation strategy for quality accreditation and sustainable competitive advantage during COVID-19 pandemic  Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences.
Nori.M.  Shah Hosseini, M. Shami Zanjani, M. Abedin, B.(2018). Designing a conceptual framework for leading digital transformation in Iranian organizations. Management and planning in educational systems. 12(2). 242-211
Osterrider, P., Budde, L., & Friedli, T. (2020). The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 10(221), 91-110.
Peters, M. A& Jandrić, P. (2018). The Digital University: A Dialogue and Manifesto, New York: Peter Lang
Qalich Khani, M. Samadi Moghadam, Y. Fathi, K. (2019). Identifying the main dimensions of the maturity of digital transformation in industrial organizations using the systematic background review approach. Technology Development Management Quarterly. 8(4). 37-1
Siemens G, Gašević D & Dawson. S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Arlington: Link Research Lab. Retrieved October 24, 20119 from http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf
Sousa. M.J, R. Cruz, J.M. Martins. (2017). Digital learning methodologies and tools – a literature review.9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. 5185-5192
Taye, M., Sang, G., & Muthanna, A. (2019). Organizational culture and its influence on the performance of higher education institutions: The case of a state university in Beijing. International Journal of Research, 8(2), 77-90.
Tjong. Yanti, Harjanto. Prabowo. (2016). Key Successful Factors for Virtual University Implementation: A Literature Study. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering. Vol. 8 No. 3.p.89-92
Torani, H.r (2019). New leadership in the digital age. The growth of school management. 19(2). 18-22
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
Zozie. P, Chawinga.W. D. (2018). Mapping an open digital university in Malawi: Implications for Africa. Research in Comparative & International Education, Vol. 13(1) 211 –226.