Challenges and Outcomes of Internationalization of Higher Education Curricula From the Perspective of Students (Case Study: Viewpoint of Graduate Students at Shiraz University)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, of Higher Education, Department of Educational Planning and Administration, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Full Professor of Curriculum, Department of Educational Planning and Administration, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Master Student of Curriculum, Department of Educational Planning and Administration, Faculty of Education& Psychology Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the challenges and perspectives of the internationalization of curricula from the viewpoint of graduate students.
Methods: The present research was carried out with a quantitative approach by using a survey strategy. The research population of the study was 2,779 graduate students of Shiraz University. 338 students were selected by stratified random sampling method and studied. The research instrument was a questionnaire made by the researcher adapted from Fathi Vajargah (2009) and Bostrom (2010) studies. To determine the validity of the questionnaire, we used Cronbach's alpha coefficient test. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics, inferential statistics method including one-sample t-test, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple variance analysis were used.
Results: The results of this study showed that from viewpoint of graduate students, the problems of equipment, human, content, and teaching methods are one of the most important challenges of internationalization of academic curricula. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of postgraduate students, the most positive outcome of the internationalization of academic curricula is the improvement of university quality, the worst consequence of internationalization of academic curricula is the excessive tendency to commercialize academic programs.
Conclusion: The existing study showed that according to graduate students, the university will face more positive consequences in the process of internationalization of curricula. The students believed that the development and internationalization of curricula created opportunities to attract foreign elites, change the approach to education to change global citizenship, enable innovation in academic curricula, access to new theories and research, innovation in teaching and research, diversification of educational programs and competencies, increasing competitiveness.

Keywords

References

Arefi, M., Hejazi, B., Haheri, R. (2008). The effects of international academic relationships on curriculum in higher education, Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 1(1), 8-22.
Bao, L. (2009). Faculty development and campus internationalization: A case study (Doctoral dissertation, Drake University).
Behjati Ardakani, F., Yar Mohammadian, M., Ahmadali H., Abari Foroughi & Fathi Vajargah, K. (2012). Comparative study of internationalization of higher education curricula in a number of countries, Curriculum Planning, 9(33), 80.
Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity (pp. 147-165). na.
Bostrom, C. A. (2010). Diffusion of internationalization in Turkish higher education. Journal of studies in international education, 14(2), 143-160.
Bruhn, E. (2017). Towards a Framework for Virtual Internationalization. Journal of Distance Education (Online), 32(1).
Bryła, P. (2019). International student mobility and subsequent migration: the case of Poland. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1386-1399.
Cheng, Y. C. (2002). Fostering local knowledge and human development in globalization of education. New Paradigm for Re-engineering Education: Globalization, Localization and Individualization, 73-94.
De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Fathi Vajargah, K & Diba, T. (2009). Virtual Global University (VGU): An International and Interdisciplinary Approach to Higher Hducation, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(3), 67-96. 
Fathi Vajargah, K., Arefi, M., Zamani Manesh, H. (2012). Evaluating Admission Barriers of Foreign Students into Universities and Institutions of Higher Education, Qurterly Journal of Research and Planing in Higher Education, 17(4), 65-80.
Fathi Vajargah, K., Zare, A., & Yamani, M. (2010). A Study of the Internationalization Curriculum Challenges (IOC) in Universities and Educational Institutions from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members at Shahid Beheshti University, Qurterly Journal of Research and Planing in Higher Education, 15(4), 63-84. 
Hakimzadeh, R. (2010). Globalization, Internationalization of higher Education and Interdisciplinary Curricula, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2(4), 1-17.
Hanson, L. (2010). Global citizenship, global health, and the internationalization of curriculum: A study of transformative potential. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(1), 70-88.
Hénard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. An IMHE Guide for Higher Education Institutions, 7-11.
Huang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2007). Connecting to the world: Curriculum and faculty internationalization of higher education in Taiwan. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9, 67-78.
Hudzik, J. K. (2015). Integrating institutional policies and leadership for 21st century internationalization. International higher education, (83), 5-7.
Khoshnodifar, M & Roshan, A. (2015). Models and Approaches to Curriculum Internationalization, International Conference of the Iranian Higher Education Association (Development of Cross-Border Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges) Mashhad.
Knight, J. (1993). Internationalization: management strategies and issues. International education magazine, 9(6), 21-22.
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of studies in international education, 8(1), 5-31.
Knight, J. (2006). Crossborder education: An analytical framework for program and provider mobility. In HIGHER EDUCATION: (pp. 345-395). Springer, Dordrecht.
Knight, J. (2007). Internationalization: Concepts, complexities and challenges. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 207-227). Springer, Dordrecht.
Knight, J., & De Wit, H. (1995). Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America, 5, 32.
Marchesani, L. S., & Adams, M. (1992). Dynamics of diversity in the teaching–learning process: A faculty development model for analysis and action.
Marginson, S. (2010). Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6962-6980.
Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory?. Routledge.
Pinar,W.F. (2008). What Is curriculum Theory? London Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Inc. publisher.Policy futures in education,1(2)m248.
Qiang, Z. (2003). Internationalization of higher education: Towards a conceptual framework. Policy futures in education, 1(2), 248-270.
Stier, J. (2003). Internationalisation, ethnic diversity and the acquisition of intercultural competencies. Intercultural Education, 14(1), 77-91.
Tight, M. (2021). Globalization and internationalization as frameworks for higher education research. Research Papers in Education, 36(1), 52-74.
Ven der wend, M. (1996). Internationalising the curriculum in higher education .in OECD (Ed). Internationalisation of higher education.
Vice, s. (2010). Internationalization  and globalization of higher Education. International exhibition for higher education. January 2010.riadh, Saudi Arabia..
Warner, G. (1992). Internationalization Models and the Role of the University. International Education Magazine, 8(1), 21.
Whalley, T. (2008). Best practice guidelines for  Internationalization  the curriculum , dougls college for the province of british Colombia ministery of education , skills and training and the center for curriculum , transfer and technology.
Williams, S. (2008). Internationalization of the curriculum: A remedy for international students’ academic adjustment difficulties. Memorial University of Newfoundland. URL: http://web. uvic. ca/~ sherriw/images/ED, 206890.
Wu, T., & Naidoo, V. (2016). The role of international marketing in higher education. In International marketing of higher education (pp. 3-9). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Higher Education Letter
Volume 15, Issue 59
September 2022
Pages 7-31

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics