تأثیر زیرساخت‌های فناوری بر قابلیت پاسخگویی به محیط با تأکید بر نقش میانجی تسهیم دانش (مورد مطالعه: دانشگاه‌های دولتی قم)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تهران، پردیس فارابی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری

چکیده

هدف از اجرای این پژوهش، بررسیتأثیرزیرساخت‌های فناوری بر قابلیت پاسخگوییبه محیط از طریق تسهیم دانش در دانشگاه‌های دولتی قم بود.جامعه آماری، اعضای هیئت علمی به تعداد 270 نفر بود که 148 نفر از آنها به صورت تصادفی خوشه‌ای به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. روش پژوهش، توصیفی- پیمایشی و ابزار اندازه‌گیری پرسشنامه بود. روایی پرسشنامه‌ها با استفاده از نظرات متخصصان حوزه مدیریت آموزش عالی و پایایی آن با محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که زیرساخت‌های فناوری از طریق متغیر میانجی تسهیم دانش بر قابلیت پاسخگویی به دانشگاه‌های قم تأثیر مثبت دارد. همچنین زیرساخت‌های فناوری به‌صورت مستقیم بر قابلیت پاسخگویی به محیط، زیرساخت‌های فناوری بر تسهیم دانش و تسهیم دانش بر قابلیت پاسخگویی به محیط تأثیر مثبت و معنی‌دار دارد.به‌منظور افزایش قابلیت پاسخگویی می‌توان فرهنگ تسهیم دانش و سرمایه‌گذاری در بخش فناوری را تقویت کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Impact of Technology Infrastructures on Environmental Responsiveness Focusing on the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing (Case of Study: Public Universities in Qom)

نویسنده [English]

  • Nahid Naderi
چکیده [English]

This study aimed at investigating the impact of technology infrastructures on environmental responsiveness focusing on the mediating role of knowledge sharing among public universities in Qom. The statistical population of the study included faculty members of these universities (N=270), among whom 148 faculty members were selected through cluster random sampling method. The research method was categorized as a descriptive-survey and the research measurement tool was mainly focused on questionnaires. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed using the opinions of the authorities and experts in higher education management. The reliability of questionnaires was confirmed through calculating the Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient. The results indicated that technology infrastructures had a significant positive impact on environmental responsiveness focusing on the mediating role of knowledge sharing among public universities in Qom. Furthermore, it was found that technology infrastructures had a direct impact on environmental responsiveness and the former had a similar impact on knowledge sharing. Finally, it was indicated that knowledge sharing had a significant positive impact on environmental responsiveness. Conclusively, the culture of knowledge sharing and investment in the technology sector can be strengthened in order to promote responsiveness.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge sharing
  • public university
  • technology infrastructure
  • environmental responsiveness
  • learning

آیت، سعید و قاسمی، مهدی (1393). ارائه چهارچوبی جهت تبیین نقش فرهنگ سازمانی و فناوری اطلاعات در ارتقای تسهیم دانش، کنفرانس بین‌المللی توسعه و تعالی کسب‌وکار، تهران، مؤسسه مدیران ایده پرداز پایتخت ویرا.

باشکوه، محمد و شکسته‌بند، میترا (1392). تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات بر چابکی کسب‌وکار.مطالعات مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 1(4)، 1 – 24.

سعادتی آذر، آسیه و نصیری، محمدجواد (1394). ارائه مدلی به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات بر کارآفرینی سازمانی با تبیین نقش میانجی‌گری تسهیم دانش (مورد مطالعه: کارکنان دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران). هفتمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی فناوری اطلاعات و دانش. http://www.civilica.com

سلیمی، قاسم؛ صباغیان، زهرا؛ دانایی‌فرد، حسن و ابوالقاسمی، محمود (1390). تسهیم دانش بین اعضای هیئت علمی در محیط‌های دانشگاهی؛ نگاهی میان‌رشته‌ای. مطالعات میان رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 3 (2 و 3)، 51 – 74.

ضیاءالدینی، محمد و کردی، نرجس (1392). بررسی رابطه بین میزان به‌کارگیری فناوری اطلاعات با تسهیم دانش در دستگاه‌های اجرایی شهر رفسنجان، کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت، چالش‌ها و راهکارها. http://www.civilica.com

نعمتی، محمدعلی (1389). مدیریت دانش، فرهنگ و آموزش عالی. فصلنامه تخصصی مانَک‌ها و مراکز رشد، 2 (7.)

نعمتی، محمدعلی؛ محمدی، یحیی و رئیسون، محمدرضا (1394). رابطه ابعاد مدیریت دانش با عملکرد آموزشی اعضای هیئت علمی. دوماهنامه راهبردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 8 (4)، 203 – 208.

 

Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17-40.

Akhavan, P.; Sanjaghi, E. M.; Rezaeenour, J. & Ojaghi, H. (2014). Examining the relationships between organizational culture, knowledge management and environmental responsiveness capability, VINE. The Journal of Information & Knowledge Management Systems, 44 (2), 228-248.

Anyanwu, E., U.; Zander, E. & Oparaku, D. (2011). Information Needs of Policy Makers in Nigeria: The Case of Imo State Civil Service. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 458. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1476&context=libphilprac

Barclay, I. P. & Dann, Z. (1996). Improving competitive responsiveness via the virtual environment, paper presented at Engineering and Technology Management. Pioneering New Technologies: Management Issues and Challenges in the Third Millennium, IEMC, Vancouver.

Bhatt, G. D. & Grover, V. (2005). Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22 (2), 253-277.

Bukowitz, W., & Williams, R. (2000). The knowledge management field book. London: Prentice Hall.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Chen, I. J.; Paulraj, A. & Lado, A. A. (2004), Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22 (5), 505-23.

Chong, C. W.; Chong, S. C. & Lin, B. (2010). Organizational demographic variables and Preliminary KM implementation success. Expert Systems with Applications, 37) 10), 7243-7254.

Das, T., K. & Elango, B. (1995). Managing strategic flexibility: key to effective performance, Journal of General Management 20, 60-60.

Dove, R. (2001). Response ability: the language, structure and culture of the agile, enterprise. John Wiley & Sons.

Dyer, J. H. & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 345-367.

Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.; Elmqvist, T.; Gunderson, L.; Holling, C.S. & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31 (5), 437–440.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.

Hair, J. F.; Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C.  (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th Ed.).  Upper Sadle River:  NJ, Pearson Education Incorporation.

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67 (3), 63–78.

Harrison, J. & Daly, M. (2009). Leveraging health information technology to improve patient. Safety, Public Administration & Management, 14 (1), 218-237.

Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6 (2), 91-100.

Hoehle, H. & Pauleen, D. (2008). KM Among Academics: Do as I teach not as I do. 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 401-411.

Holweg, M. (2005). The three dimensions of responsiveness, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (7/8), 603-622.

Gold, A. H.; Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (1), 185-214.

Gopalakrishnan, S. & Babu, B. Ramesh (2008). Knowledge Sharing Tools and Technology: An Overview. Journal of Library and Information Technology, 28 (5), 19-26.

Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Kim, S. & Ju, B. (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 282–290.

Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1-18.

Kritchanchai, Duangpun & MacCarthy, B. L. (1999). Responsiveness of the order fulfilment process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19 (8), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910274419

Keong, L. C. & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002). Factors Impacting Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 1 (1), 49-56.

Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2003). Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), 297-317.

Lee, J. N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information and Management, 38 (5), 323-35.

Lou, S. J.; Yang, Y. S. & Shih, R. C. (2007). A study on the knowledge sharing behavior of information management instructors at technological universities in Taiwan. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 6 (1), 143-149.

Mithas, S.; Ramasubbu, N.; Krishnan, M. S. & Sambamurthy, V. (2009). Information Technology Infrastructure Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. http://misrc.umn.edu/workshops/2004/spring/sunil.pdf.

Montes, F. J. L.; Moreno, A. R., & Fernandes, L. M. M. (2004). Assessing the organizational climate and Contractual Relationship for Perception of Support for innovation. Journal of Information Science Management, 25 (2), 167-180.

Nidumolu, S. R., & Knotts, G. W. (1998). The effects of customizability and reusability on perceived process and competitive performance of software firms. MIS Quarterly, 22 (2), 105-137.

Pavlou, Paul A. & El Sawy, Omar A. (2011). Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities (February 18, 2011). Decision Sciences, 42 (1), 239-273. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2369339

Reichhart, A. & Holweg, M. (2007). Creating the customer-responsive supply chain: a reconciliation of concepts. International Journal of Production Planning & Control, 27 (11), 1144-1172.

Ropes, D (2015). Cultivating responsiveness: learning and development in complex environments. Available at: https://www.inholland.nl/media/12100/lectoralerede_donald-ropes.pdf

Ryan, S. D.; Windsor, J. C.; Ibragimova, B. & Prybutok, V. R. (2010). Organizational practices that foster knowledge sharing: validation across distinct national cultures, informing Science. The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 13, 139-146.

Silver, H. (2007). Higher education and social change: Purpose in pursuit? History of Education, 36 (4), 535-550. doi: 10.1080/00467600701496815.

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.

Thierauf, R. J. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems for Business. Westport Conn, Quorum Books.

Tikhomirova, N. & Gritsenko, A. & Pechenkin, A. (2008). University Approach to Knowledge Management. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management System, 38 (1), 16-21.

Tunc, E. A. & Gupta, J. N. D. (1993). Is time a competitive weapon among manufacturing firms? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13 (3), 4-12.

Wang, C. L. & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Management Review, 9 (1), 31-51.

Xue, Y.; Bradley, J. & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (2), 299-312.

Yang, X, (2013). Study on Knowledge Sharing Mechanism of University Teachers in Information Age, International Conference on Education Technology and Information System, Published by Atlantis Press.

Youndt, M. A. & Snell, S. (2004). Human resource configurations, intellectual capital and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16 (3), 337–360.

Zahidul Islam, M. D.; Jasimuddin, Sajjid M. & Hasan, Ikramul (2015). Organizational culture, structure, technology infrastructure and knowledge sharing. VINE, 45 (1), 67 – 88.