طراحی الگوی مرزگستری در آموزش عالی با روش فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی‏ سینا، همدان، ایران

2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی‏ سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22034/HEL.2024.710185

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش طراحی الگوی مرزگستری در آموزش عالی به روش فراترکیب بود.
روش پژوهش: پژوهش یک پژوهش کیفی بود و به روش فراترکیب انجام شد. جامعه مورد مطالعه پژوهش‏های منتشر شده سال‏های 2012 تا 2023 در زبان انگلیسی و سال‏های 1392 تا 1402 در زبان فارسی در زمینه مرزگستری در آموزش عالی در پایگاه ‏داده‏های علمی Magiran, Noormagz  SID,، Taylor & Francis, Sage Wiley, Scopus, ProQuest, Emerald, Elsevier, Science Direct, DOAJ, Springer,  بود.  پس از جستجو، ارزیابی و حذف، از بین 320 مقاله درنهایت تعداد 34 مقاله به‏منظور تحلیل نهایی انتخاب شد. به‏منظور دست‏یابی به هدف پژوهش از الگوی هفت‏مرحله‏ای سندلوسکی و باروسو  استفاده شد. تحلیل مقالات به روش کدگذاری انجام شد. اعتباریابی یافته‌ها بر اساس کدگذاری شخص خبره و محاسبه ضریب کاپا انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: مرزگستری دانشگاهی در سطح فردی و سازمانی دارای 6 بعد است. سطح سازمانی شامل: موضوعات نهادی و ساختاری مرزگستری، استراتژی‏های مرزگستری، نتایج مرزگستری دانشگاهی و چالش‏های مرزگستری و سطح فردی شامل نقش و وظایف مرزگستر دانشگاهی، شایستگی‌ها و ویژگی‏های مرزگستر دانشگاهی است.
نتیجه‌گیری: مرزگستری دانشگاهی با تکیه بر استراتژی‏ها، موضوعات نهادی و ساختاری، ویژگی‏ها، مهارت‏ها و توانایی‏های اعضاء هیئت علمی به نتایج و پیامدهای مثبتی نظیر چابکی، انعطاف‏پذیری، نوآوری و تولید ایده‏های خلاق، افزایش سرمایه اجتماعی، گسترش استفاده از دانش علمی در تصمیم‏‌گیری منجر می‏شود. در این راستا، دانشگاه و اعضاء آن با چالش‏هایی نظیر چالش‏های سازمانی، چالش‏های فردی، درون‏فردی و بین‏فردی، چالش‏های بین‏مرزی، چالش‏های شغلی-نقشی مواجه هستند که با مدیریت آنها، در نهایت دانشگاه می‏تواند به مأموریت خود در ارتباط با صنعت و جامعه عمل نموده و بقاء خود را در عرصه رقابت با سایر دانشگاه‏ها حفظ نماید.   

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing the Model of Boundary Spanning in Higher Education with Meta-synthesis Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeid Norollahee 1
  • Siroos Ghanbari 2
1 PhD student in educational management, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Professor of Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The aim of the research was to design a model of Boundary Spanning in the higher education using Meta-synthesis method.
Methods: The research was a qualitative research and was carried out in a meta- synthesis method. The studied population is the researches published in the years 2012 to 2023 in English and in the years 1392 to 1402 in Persian in the field of Boundary Spanning in higher education in the scientific databases of Magiran, Noormagz & SID, Taylor & Francis, Sage Wiley, Scopus, ProQuest, Emerald, Elsevier, Science Direct, DOAJ, Springer. After searching, evaluating and eliminating, among 320 articles, 34 articles were finally selected for final analysis. The research was conducted using Sandelowski and Barroso's model. Analysis of articles was done by coding method. Validation of the findings was done based on expert coding and Kappa coefficient calculation.
Results: Academic boundary spanning at the organizational level includes: institutional and structural issues, strategies, results and challenges, and at the individual level it includes the role and duties, competencies and characteristics of the academic boundary spanner.
Conclusion: Academic boundary spanning based on strategies, institutional and structural issues, characteristics, skills and abilities of faculty members leads to positive results and consequences such as agility, flexibility, innovation and production of creative ideas. Increasing social capital leads to the expansion of the use of scientific knowledge in decision-making. So, the university and its members are facing challenges such as organizational, individual, intrapersonal and interpersonal, cross-border, job-role. By managing challenges, the university can finally fulfill its mission in relation to industry and society and maintain its survival in the field of competition with other universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Boundary Spanning
  • Academic Boundary Spanner
  • Industry university linkage
References
Abidi, O., Nimerm, K., Bani-Mustafa, A., & Toglaw, S. (2022). Relationship between faculty characteristics and their entrepreneurial orientation in higher education institutions in Kuwait. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11, 12, 1-22.
Alexander, A., Teller, Ch., & Roggeveen, A. L. (2016). The Boundary Spanning of Managers within Service Delivery Networks. Journal of Business Research. 69, 12, 6031-6039.
Al-Youbi, A.O., Zahed, A.H.M., Nahas, M.N., & Hegazy, A.A. (2021). The Roles of Universities in Development. In: The Leading World’s Most Innovative Universities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59694-1_1
Anania, E. C., Disher, T. J., Kring, J. P., Iwig, C. L., Keebler, J. R., Lazarra, E. H., & Salas, E. (2017). Communication in the Spaceflight Multi-Team System: Training and Technology Recommendations to Support Boundary Spanners. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601520
Badruddin, S., Burhanudddin, B., & Halim, P. (2019). The influence of innovation performance and national competitiveness on entrepreneurial education. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20 (2), 104-113.
Bartel-Radic, A., & Munch, F. (2023). Cross-cultural boundary spanning activities in a global team: Insights from an ethnographic case study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231185432
Bednarek, A. T., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C., Meyer, R., Colvin, R. M., Addison, P.F. E, Close, S. L., Curran, K., Farooque, M., Goldman, E., Hart, D., Mannix, H., McGreavy, B., Parris. A., Posner, S., Robinson, C., Ryan, M., Leith, P. (2018). Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives. Sustain Sci. 13(4):1175-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9. Epub 2018 Mar 27. PMID: 30147800; PMCID: PMC6086300.
Beltramo, J. L. (2016). A Case of Teacher–Assistant Principals: Spanning the Boundary Between Administration and Faculty Through Re-emergent Practices in Teacher Leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 26(2), 249–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461602600203
Bordogna, C. M. (2018). The effects of boundary spanning on the development of social capital between faculty members operating transnational higher education partnerships. Studies in Higher Education, 44, 2, 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1349742
Christ, K. L., Burritt, R. L., Guthrie, J., & Evans, E. (2018). The potential for ‘boundary-spanning organisations’ in addressing the research-practice gap in sustainability accounting, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9, 4, 552-568. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2017-0059
Christopherson, E. G., Howell, E. L., Scheufele, D. A., Viswanath, K., & West, N. P. (2021). How science philanthropy can build equity. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 19 (4): 48–55. doi:10.48558/P4G8-QM77.
Curnin, S. (2018). Organizational Boundary Spanning. Global Encyclopedia of Public Adminnstration, public policy, and Government, 4260-4264.
Gauntner, J., & Hansman, C. A. (2017). Boundary-Spanner Role Conflict in Public Urban Universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12, 1, 104-131.
Ghoraishi khorasgani, M. S., & Nazarzadeh zare, M. A. (2021). Look at the Challenges of Boundary-Spanner Academic Leaders. Ihej, 13 (2) :72-95. [In Persian]
Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. USA: Advanced Analytics LLC.
Hatch, M. B. A., Parrish, J. K. Heppell, S. S., Augustine, S. Campbell, L. Divine, L. M., Donatuto, J., Groesbeck, A. S., & Smith, N. F. (2023). Boundary spanners: a critical role for enduring collaborations between Indigenous communities and mainstream scientists. Ecology and Society, 28(1):41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13887-280141
Hill, L. B. (2016). Advancing Undergraduate Stem Reform through Multi-Institutional Networks: The Role of Formal Boundary Spanners. Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education – Doctor of Philosophy.
Ho, J., Kang, T., & Shaari, I. (2021). Leading from the middle: vice-principals in Singapore as boundary spanners, Journal of Educational Administration, 59, 2, 145-161. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/JEA-05-2020-0123
Kim, S.L., Lee, D., & Yun, S. (2022). Leader boundary-spanning behavior and creative behavior: the role of need for status and creative self-efficacy, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43, 6, 835-846. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/LODJ-05-2021-0235
Kislov, R., Hyde, P., & McDonald, R. (2017). New Game, Old Rules? Mechanisms and Consequences of Legitimation in Boundary Spanning Activities. Organization Studies, 38(10), 1421–1444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616679455
Lam, A. (2018). Boundary-crossing careers and the ‘third space of hybridity’: Career actors as knowledge brokers between creative arts and academia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1716–1741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17746406
Lam, A. (2020). Hybrids, identity and knowledge boundaries: Creative artists between academic and practitioner communities. Human Relations, 73(6), 837–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719846259
Larsen, P. W. (2020). Researchers as boundary spanners. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 9, 48-56.
Lima, J. C., Torkomian, A. L. V., Pereira, S. C., Oprime, P. C., Hashiba, L. H. (2021).  Socioeconomic Impacts of University–Industry Collaborations–A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, 2, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020137.
Marrone, J. A., Quigley, N. R., Prussia, G. E., & Dienhart, J. (2022). Can Supportive Coaching Behaviors Facilitate Boundary Spanning and Raise Job Satisfaction? An Indirect-Effects Model. Journal of Management, 48(5), 1131–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211003951
Mars, M. M., & Moravec, B. G. (2022). PhD students as boundary spanning agents: an exploration of student values, goals, and agency in the era of cross-sector permeation, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 13, 2, 205-220. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/SGPE-08-2021-0057
Martin, L., & Ibbotson, P. (2019). Boundary spanning as identity work in university business engagement roles. Studies in Higher Education, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1688281
Matous, P., & Wang, P. (2019). External exposure, boundary spanning, and opinion leadership in remote communities: A network experment. Social Networks, 10-22.
Messenger, H., & Bloisi, W. (2020). Experience, Skill and Competence: Boundary Spanning Capabilities for Leadership and Management of Transnational Education, Sengupta, E., Blessinger, P. and Mahoney, C. (Ed.) Leadership Strategies for Promoting Social Responsibility in Higher Education (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 24), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 141-160.
Mikhailov, A., Puffal, D., & Santini, M. (2020). University-Industry Relations and Industrial Innovation: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of technology management & innovation, 15, 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000300006 
Mors, M. L., Rogan, M., & Lynch, S. E. (2018). Boundary spanning and knowledge exploration in a professional services firm, Journal of Professions and Organization, 5, 3, 184–205, https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy012
Nair, U. K., & Tandon, A. (2015). Boundary Objects and End User Engagement: Illustrations from the Social Enterprise Domain. S. Sahadev et al. (eds.), Boundary Spanning Elements and the Marketing Function in Organizations, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13440-6_9
Nazarzadeh zare, M. A., & Ghoraishi khorasgani, M. S. (2022). Boundary-spanning leadership as a necessity for academic administrators. International Journal of Educational Management. 4, 527-540.
Prysor, D., & Henley, A. (2018). Boundary spanning in higher education leadership: identifying boundaries and practices in a British university. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 12, 2210-2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1318364
Purcell, J., Pearl, A., & Van Schyndel, T. (2020). Boundary spanning leadership among community-engaged faculty: An exploratory study of faculty participating in higher education community engagement. Engaged Scholar Journal, 6(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v6i2.69398
Qian, H., Walker, A., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Boundary-spanning practices of system leaders in China: Enabling conditions and inherent tensions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231174690
Ryan, A., & O’Malley, L. (2016). The role of the boundary spanner in bringing about innovation in cross-sector partnerships. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.09.002.
Sahadev, S., Purani, K., & Malhotra, N. (2015). Managing Boundary Spanning Elements: An Introduction. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13440-6_1
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
Schotter, A.P.J., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y. L., & Gaur, A. (2017). Boundary spanning in global organizations, Journal of Management Studies, 54, 4, 403-421.
Schwetje, T., Hauser, C., Böschen, S., & Leßmöllmann, A. (2020), Communicating science in higher education and research institutions: An organization communication perspective on science communication, Journal of Communication Management, 24, 3, 189-205. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0094
Shah, H., Simeon, J., Fisher, K. Q., Eddy, S. L. (2022). Talking Science: Undergraduates’ Everyday Conversations as Acts of Boundary Spanning That Connect Science to Local Communities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0151
Skolaski, J. P. (2012). Boundary spanning in higher education: How universities can enable success. The University of Wisconsin – Madison, Doctor of Philosophy, Community and Nonprofit Leadership. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
van Geenhuizen, M. (2018). A framework for the evaluation of living labs as boundary spanners in innovation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(7), 1280–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417753623
Vauterin, J., Linnanen, L., & Marttila, E. (2012). Value creation in international higher education: The role of boundary spanning in university‐industry collaboration, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 4, 3, 283-298. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/17566691211269594
Wang, J. (S)., Fu, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Can “bad” stressors spark “good” behaviors in frontline employees? Incorporating motivation and emotion, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33, 1, 101-124. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2020-0519
Wegemer, C. M., & Renick, J. (2021). Boundary Spanning Roles and Power in Educational Partnerships. AERA Open, XX, X, 1-14. DOI: 10.1177/23328584211016868
Widmann, A., & Mulder, R. H. (2018). Team learning behaviours and innovative work behaviour in work teams, European Journal of Innovation Management, 21, 3, 501-520. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0194
Zhang, C., Viswanathan, S., & Henke, J. W. (2011). The boundary spanning capabilities of purchasing agents in buyer-supplier trust development, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 4, 318-328.
Zhang, Q., & Li, J. (2021). Can employee's boundary-spanning behavior exactly promote innovation performance? The roles of creative ideas generation and team task interdependence, International Journal of Manpower, 42, 6, 1047-1063. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/IJM-06-2019-0302
Zheng, Z., & Ahmed, R. I. (2022). Humble leadership and employee creative performance in China: the roles of boundary spanning behavior and traditionality, Personnel Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/PR-10-2021-0775