مطالعه پدیدارشناختی عدالت آموزشی در محیط یادگیری مجازی در آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد تاریخ و فلسفه آموزش و پرورش، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان

3 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22034/hel.2024.2017692.1935

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف مطالعه پدیدارشناختی عدالت آموزشی در محیط یادگیری مجازی در آموزش عالی انجام شد. رویکرد پژوهش، کیفی و روش پدیدارشناسی بود.
روش پژوهش: نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از ترکیب دو روش ملاک محور و در دسترس با قاعده اشباع نظری است، مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش را 30 نفر از دانشجویان کارشناسی‌ارشد رشته علوم تربیتی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان در سال‌های 1397 الی 1399 تشکیل دادند. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس کیودا 10 تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد که دانشجویان در هر یک از بعد‌های عدالت آموزشی تجربه‌شده با مقوله‌های مختلفی روبرو بودند. در بعد عدالت توزیعی مقوله‌های برنامه‌ریزی و اجرا، دانش و مهارت لازم، ارزشیابی، زیرساخت‌های آموزش مجازی، سواد‌ رسانه‌ای، در بعد عدالت رویه‌ای مقوله‌های ارزشیابی و عدالت در ارائه خدمات آموزشی و در بعد عدالت مراوده‌‌ای مقولات سطح تعاملی در بعد رفتار، مشکلات فنی و محرک‌های محیطی-کلاسی شناسایی شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس یافته‌ها موفقیت در آموزش مجازی مستلزم داشتن زیرساخت‌ها و مهارت‌های ارتباطی عالی و طراحی و برنامه‌ریزی و مشارکت فعال فراگیران و اساتید است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Phenomenological Study of Educational Justice in Virtual Learning Environment in Higher Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zeinab Baharvand 1
  • Faramarz Mohamadi Poua 2
  • Azimeh Sadat Khakbaz 3
1 Master's student in History and Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Master of the Educational Sciences of Daneshgah Bou Ali Sina Hamedan
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The present research was conducted with the aim of studying phenomenological cognitive justice in virtual learning environment in higher education. The research approach was qualitative and the method used was phenomenology.
Methods: Purposive sampling is a combination of two methods of criterion collection and accessible with the theoretical saturation rule. The participants of the research were 30 graduate students pedagogy at  Bu-Ali Sina University in the years 1397 to 1399. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA 10 software.
Results: The findings showed that students faced various issues in each dimension of educational justice. In the distributive justice dimension, issues related to planning and implementation, necessary knowledge and skills, evaluation, virtual learning infrastructure, media literacy, and interactive level were identified. In the procedural justice dimension, issues related to evaluation and justice in providing educational services were identified. In the interactional justice dimension, issues related to behavior, technical difficulties, and environmental stimuli were identified.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, success in virtual learning requires excellent communication skills, design and planning, and active participation of learners and teachers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Phenomenology
  • Educational Justice
  • Learning Environment
  • Distributive Justice
  • Procedural
  • Interactional
References
Abbasi, F., Hajazi, A., & Hakimzadeh, R. (2020). Teachers' experiences of opportunities and challenges in teaching in the educational network of students (Shad): A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Science, 22(11), 84-49. 
Burke, M., Levin, B. L., & Hanson, A. (2003). Distance learning. In Building a virtual library (pp. 148-163). IGI Global.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes86(2), 278-321.
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. International review of industrial and organizational psychology12, 317-372.
Dibayi Saber, M., and Jamshidi, N., Khonifar, H., & Nadri, J. (2013). Designing an organizational justice model inspired by adult education and experts' opinions. Journal of Cultural Organizational Management, 3(11), 51-75. 
Ebadi, R. (2004). E-learning and education. Tehran: Fattab Mehr Publications.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, Terry. (2003). E-Learning in the 21Century: A Framework For Research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer. International Review Of Industrial And Organizational Psychology, No 12, pp 317-372.
Ghorban Khan, M., & Salehi, K. (2016). Representation of virtual education practices in the Iranian higher education system: Studies with a phenomenological approach. Journal of Information Technology and Communication in Educational Sciences, 15(20), 137-169.
Imami sigarudi, A., Dehqan Niri, M., Rahnavard, Z., & Noori Saeed, A. (2012). Qualitative research methodology: Phenomenology. Journal of Comprehensive Nursing and Midwifery, 9(21), 29-57. 
Jafari, A., Hemayounibakhshayesh, N., & Vahed Almahdi, J. (2021). Students' experiences of justice in virtual education courses. Journal of Educational Technology, 13(17), 11-36.
Jahanian, R. (2010). New approaches in education. Tehran: Sarafzar Publications.
Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. (2006). When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes99(2), 175-201.
Jung. I, Choi. S, Lim. C, & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of Different Types of Interaction on Learning Achievement, Satisfaction and participation in webbased instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39 (2), 153-162.
Kazemi, B. (2002). Management of employee affairs. Administration of employment and human resources. Tehran: Center for Management Education Publications.
Karimi, M. (2021). Phenomenological analysis of experiences of professors and students in virtual education in the Iranian higher education system. Journal of Information Technology and Communication in Educational Sciences, 19(31), 27-53.
Keyan, M. (2014). Virtual education practices: A narrative not taught in virtual universities. Journal of Electronic Learning University, 5(3), 11-22. 
Kizza, J. M. (Ed.). (2003). Ethical and social issues in the information age. New York, NY: Springer New York.
Konvsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. S. (1993). Perceived justice of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitude of job performance. Journal of applied psychology, 5, 698-708.
Levin HM. (2017). The economic payoff to investing in educational justice. In P. Siljander et al (eds.) Schools in Transition. New York: Sage Publications. p. 161-188.
Lin, Q. Muhammad, A. Rasha, A., & Muhammad, Y. (2020). Covid 19 Panademic and Online Education in Hong Kong: An Exploratory Study. International Journal on Emerging Technologies 11(5): 411-418.
Liu, N. Zhang, F. Wei, C. Jia, Y. Shang, Z. & Sun, L. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter. Psychiatry Research, 287 (March), Article 112921.
Maila D. H. Rahiem. (2020). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-2486 mayla.
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 35(3), 626-637.
Nadiri, H., & Tanova, C. (2010). An investigation of the role of justice in turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality industry. International journal of hospitality management, 29(1), 33-41.
Quacquarelli. S. (2020). The impact of the coronavirus on global higher education (Matin. A, Trans). In Collection of International Reports on Higher Education.Coronavirus Crisis,Tehran.Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies (Original work published (2020).
Rezi, M. (2019). Perceived educational justice and students' academic performance. Journal of Organizational Cultural Management, 17(10), 106-149. 
Sayari, H., Lotfipour, P., and Kamapur, A. (2012). The effect of education based on information and communication technology in the development of educational justice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(23), 2-28. 
Shabaninia, F., & Mokhtari, V. (2008). Analysis and design of electronic educational systems (virtual). Tehran: Khaniran Publications. 
Staley, a. b., dastoor, b., magner, n. r., & stolp, c .(2003). The contribution of organizational justice in budget decision making to federal managers organizational commitment. Journal of public budgeting, accounting & financial management,15(4),505-515.
Stovall, D. (2013). Against the politics of desperation: Educational justice, critical race theory, and Chicago school reform. Critical Studies in Education. 2013; 54(1): 33-43.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, I.
Yari Gheli, B. (2014). Students' experience of justice from professors: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences, 4(7), 272-265.
Yari Gheli, B., Zarghami, S., Ghazvini, S., Ghadiri, Y., & Naqibzadeh, M. (2012). Comparative analysis of educational justice philosophy: Liberal and sociocultural perspectives. Research on the Foundations of Education, 1(2), 91-108.
Zarei Zavareki, A. (2005). E-learning and higher education. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Alameh Tabatabai University.