مطالعه اکتشافی نحوه و میزان استفادة دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی از فضای مجازی در فعالیت‌های پژوهشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه روشها، برنامه ریزی درسی و آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران؛ استاد گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22034/hel.2024.709930

چکیده

هدف: هدف این پژوهش کشف نحوه و میزان استفادة دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی از فضای مجازی در فعالیت‌های پژوهشی بود. در این پژوهش از روش ترکیبی(آمیخته) اکتشافی متوالی استفاده شد.
روش پژوهش: میدان پژوهش در این بخش دانشکده­های علوم انسانی دانشگاه بوعلی­سینا بود که 20 نفر از دانشجویان به شیوه ملاک محور برای مصاحبة نیمه‌ساختار‌یافته انتخاب شدند. نتایج حاصل از مصاحبه با روش تحلیل مضمون از نوع سلسله مراتبی تحلیل شد. سپس در مرحله کمی، از روش پیمایشی برای جمع­آوری اطلاعات استفاده شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش دانشجویان دانشکده­های علوم انسانی دانشگاه بوعلی­سینا بودند که به شیوه طبقه­ای نسبتی 252 نفر انتخاب شدند.  داده­ها با استفاده از شاخص­های آمار توصیفی و آزمون T  تک نمونه­ای تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: نتیجه حاصل از تحلیل کیفی پژوهش حاکی از آن بود که: دانشجویان متناسب با مراحل دوازده‌گانه پژوهش، ابزارهای جستجو و بازیابی منابع، ابزارهای مشارکتی و ابزارهای تهیة محتوا را به کار می‌گیرند. همچنین نتایج حاصل از مرحله کمی پژوهش نشان داد که میزان استفاده دانشجویان از فضای مجازی به صورت ابزارهای جستجو و بازیابی منابع، ابزارهای مشارکتی، و ابزارهای تهیة محتوا در فعالیت‌های پژوهش در سطح معناداری بوده و بالاتر از حد متوسط است که از میان ابزارها، بیشترین استفاده مربوط به ابزارهای جستجو و بازیابی منابع و بعد ابزارهای تهیة محتوا و بعد ابزارهای مشارکتی است.
نتیجه‌گیری: دانشگاه­ها باید برای آشنا سازی دانشجویان با قابلیت های اینترنت در پژوهش گام­های عملی بردارند و تصمیم­های مهمی اتخاذ نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploratory the Method and Amount Use of Graduate Students from Virtual Space in Research Activities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farhad Seraji 1
  • Muhammad Reza Golmohammady 2
1 Professor of the Department of Methods, Curriculum and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
2 Department of education, Bu - Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The purpose of this research was to find out how and how much postgraduate students use virtual space in research activities.
Methods: This research was conducted with a mixed exploratory approach. In the qualitative phase, The field of research was 20 students were selected for semi-structured interview based on criteria. The results of the interviews were analyzed using the hierarchical thematic analysis method. Then, in the quantitative stage, a survey method was used to collect information. The statistical population of the research was the students of humanities faculties of Bu -Ali Sina University, 252 people were selected in a relative stratified manner. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-sample T-test.
Results: The result of the qualitative analysis of the research indicated that: students use resources search and retrieval tools, collaborative tools and content preparation tools in accordance with the twelve stages of research. Also, the results of the quantitative phase of the research showed that the amount of students' use of virtual space in the form of resources search and retrieval tools, collaborative tools, and content preparation tools in research activities was at a significant level and above the average level, among the tools, the most The use is related to search and resource retrieval tools, content preparation tools, and collaborative tools.
Conclusion: Universities should take practical steps and make important decisions to acquaint students with the capabilities of the Internet in research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: resource retrieval tools
  • content preparation
  • collaborative tools
  • research
  • postgraduate education
  • virtual space

References

Addo-Tenkorang, R., & Helo, P. T. (2016). Big data applications in operations/supply-chain management: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering,101, 528–543.
Apuke, Oberiri Destiny & Iyendo, Timothy Onosahwo (2018). University students' usage of the internet resources for research and learning: forms of access and perceptions of utility. Heliyon, 4(12), 1-34.
Aryani. A., Zahedbabolan. A., Moienikia. M., Khalegkhah. A(2015).The role of virtual social networks on graduate students' research capabilities. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-learning in Medical sciences, 6(2),26-39.
Behzadi, H., & davarpanah, M. (2009). Factors Influencing the Research Experience of the Graduate Students at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Library and Information Science Research010(2), -. doi: 10.22067/riis.v10i2.5763.
Bian, J., Lyu, T., Loiacono, A., Viramontes, T. M., Lipori, G., Guo, Y., ... & Hogan, W. (2020). Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(12), 1999-2010.
Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria; Boulton, Elicia; Davey, Louise & McEvoy, Charlotte (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology,23(2), 1-14.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cohen, Yael Helfman & Reich, Yorman (2016). Literature Review Conclusions and Definition of Research Target. Biomimetic Design Method for Innovation and Sustainability, 15(1),45-49.
Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C., Gounopoulos, D., Platanakis, E., & Zhang, W. (2023). Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking. European Journal of Operational Research306(1), 1-16.
Deng, S., Tong, J., Lin, Y., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Motivating scholars’ responses in academic social networking sites: An empirical study on ResearchGate Q&A behavior. Information Processing & Management56(6), 102082.
Eller, Lucille Sanzero; Kleber, Elizabeth & Wang, Shiow Lan (2003). Research knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals. Nursing Outlook, 51(4), 165-170.
Forbes, H. J., Travers, J. C., & Johnson, J. V. (2023). Supporting the replication of your research. In Research Ethics in Behavior Analysis (pp. 237-262). Academic Press.
Gupta, Madhu & Mehtani, Dimple (2015). Effect of academic stream and gender on attitude of research scholars towards research. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 5(6), 177-189.
Ghaffarzadeh.S. H., Nazari H, Ghasemi R, Ahmadi Doyran Z (2011). Status of research among medical students of urmia university medial science in (knowledge, attiude and practice). Nursing and Midwifery Journal,9 (5), 34-45.
Hall, Peter A (2006). Systematic process analysis: when and how to use it. European Management Review, 3(1), 24-31.
Heydari A, Yazdimoghaddam H.(2015). Thematic Analysis of Nursing MSc Theses: a Necessity to Improve the Quality of Nursing Postgraduate Courses. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14 (12) :1029-1036.
Kepes, S., Keener, S. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Hartman, N. S. (2022). Questionable research practices among researchers in the most research‐productive management programs. Journal of Organizational Behavior43(7), 1190-1208.
Hewson, Claire M (2014). Research Methods on the Internet(Edition:Volume 5). publisher: De Gruyter Mouton, Handbooks of Communication and technology series.
 
King, N (2004). Using template analysis in the thematic analysis of text ( In Cassell, catherine & Symon, Gillian. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research).Sage, 256–270.
Jafari Sani, H., & Keramati, E. (2011). A Study of Faculty Members Attitude about the Relationship between their Research and Teaching Activities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education18(2), 1-17.
Manapat, P. D., Anderson, S. F., & Edwards, M. C. (2022). A revised and expanded taxonomy for understanding heterogeneity in research and reporting practices. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication.9(4), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000488
Marchionini, Gary (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 41-46.
Murray, Danielle M & Fisher, Jeffrey D (2002). The Internet: A virtually untapped tool for research. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19(2-3), 5-18.
 
Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. The British accounting review51(6), 100833.
Oztemel, E., Gursev, S.(2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell Manuf 31, 127–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.
Razavieh, A., & Fayazi, M. (2010). An Analysis of the Effects of Internet on the Educationaand Research Data Acquisition Behavior of Universityl. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration1(2), 1-16.
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan. A.,Hejazie.A(2017). Research method in behavior science. 10edtin, Tehran:Agah.
Seraji. F(2010). Application of internet tools in education and research (A guide for faculty member and students. Tehran: Ayezh.
Seraji.F., Hattami. J (2012). Internet copebilites as a possibility to facilitate and strengthen educational research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 4(1), 52-63.
Seraji, F ., Khodavisi, S (2014). Comparison of technological research skills of face-to-face and virtual students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 5(1), 1-10
Shariati. M.(2011). Pathology of the Obstacles in the Way of Implementing Research among Faculty Members and Presenting Applied Strategies. Educational Administration Research3(9), 45-65.
Tayefehbagher, D., Abazari, Z., Moradi, S., & Babalhavaeji, F. (2022). A Model for Evaluating the Impact of Humanities Research in Iran. Scientometrics Research Journal8(1), 1-34. doi: 10.22070/rsci.2020.13384.1450.
Treagust, David F & Tsui, Chi Yan (2016). Commentary: Developments and Reforms in Science Education for Improving the Quality of Teaching and Research. In Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, Springer, Singapore, 119-128.
Usher, Robin (2002). A diversity of doctorates: fitness for the knowledge economy?. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2), 143-153.
Weber, H., Becker, D., & Hillmert, S. (2019). Information-seeking behaviour and academic success in higher education: Which search strategies matter for grade differences among university students and how does this relevance differ by field of study? Higher Education, 77(4), 657-678. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0296-4
Wisker, Gina (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Red Global Press.