الگوی کاربردی طراحی برنامه درسی بین رشته‌ای در حوزه آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی - دانشگاه کردستان

چکیده

چکیده: رویکرد بین‌رشته‌ای نشان‌گر جهت نگاه و چگونگی شناخت و فهم مسائل و موضوعات پیچیده، چندوجهی و چندبخشی است که در فضای بین ‌رشتگی معنا می‌یابد. برنامه درسی میان‌رشته‌ای هم یک فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری است که دارای ویژگی‌های راه‌یابانه یا خلاق[1]، رفت و برگشتی و غیرخطی[2] و تأملی[3] است که بر حول مسائل، سؤالات و موضوعات پیچیده شکل می‌گیرد. هدفاین مقاله ارائه یک الگوی کاربردی به منظور طراحی برنامه‌های درسی بین رشته‌ای در سطح آموزش عالی است. پژوهش از نوع تحقیقات مروری و روش گردآوری داده‌ها روش کتابخانه‌ای است. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از چک لیست‌های موضوعی استفاده شده است. نتایج تحقیق بیانگر آن است که یک برنامه درسی بین رشته‌ای با تعیین یک موضوع یا مسأله بین رشته‌ای آغاز و با خلق یک فهم بین رشته‌ای از آن مسائل و موضوعات و ارزشیابی آن منتهی می‌گردد.



[1]. Heuristics


[2]. Iterative


[3]. Reflexive 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing Interdisciplinary Curriculum Applied Model in Higher Education

نویسنده [English]

  • Jamal Salimi
چکیده [English]

Abstract: An interdisciplinary curriculum is a decision-making process that has specific characters Heuristics, Iterative and Reflexive. Interdisciplinary curriculum first will be formed to revolve around issues, questions and complex issues. Interdisciplinary curriculum process ultimately lead to a set of decisions, is to produce a final product (interdisciplinary understanding). The main goal of the article is presenting a practical model for designing interdisciplinary curriculum in higher education. The research type is review studies and the method of data collection is library method For collecting the data subjective check list is used. The result of study shows that a process of interdisciplinary curriculum study is started by determining of subject and themes and developed to produce an interdisciplinary understanding of the problem and Leads to the evaluation of interdisciplinary understanding.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Curriculum
  • Interdisciplinary Curriculum
  • Higher education Interdisciplinary curriculum
  • curriculum design
  • model

سلیمی، جمال و ملکی، حسن (a1389). طراحی برنامه درسی بین رشته‌ای در آموزش عالی؛ فصلنامه مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای  در علوم انسانی، 2 (4): 39 – 68.

سلیمی، جمال و ملکی، حسن (b1389). برنامه درسی بین رشته‌ای در آموزش عالی: چیستی و چگونگی، مجله نامه آموزش عالی، 3 (11): 145 -  177.

فرهنگی، علی‌اکبر و صفرزاده، حسین (1385). روش‌های تحقیق در علوم انسانی، تهران: انتشارات پویش.

ملکی، حسن و سلیمی، جمال (c1389). از نظام دیسیپلینی تا رویکرد بین رشته‌ای در برنامه درسی آموزش عالی، فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی آموزش عالی، 1 (1): 65 – 95.

 

Baily, C. I. (1981). Sport and exchange theory, Sociology of Sport, 5 (16): 143-169.

Boix Mansilla, V. (2005b). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, January/February, 14-21.

Boyd, I. (2006).Studying complexity: Are we approaching the limits of science? In J. Atkinson and M. Crowe (Eds.), Interdisciplinary research: Diverse approaches on science, technology, health and society (pp.25-40).West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons.

Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond One's Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity. In Peter Weingart and Nico Stehr (Eds.),Practicing Interdisciplinarity (pp. 115-133). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, M. A.: Cambridge University Press.

Derry, S. J.; Schunn, C. D. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Towards a new economics. New York: Free Press.

Ezzo, J.; Bausell, B.; Moerman, D. E.; Berman, B. & Hadhazy, V. (2001). Reviewing the reviews: how strong is the evidence; how clear are the conclusions? The International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care; 17: 457-66.

Fischer, C. C. (1988). On the need for integrating occupational sex discrimination theory on the basis of causal variables. Issues in Integrative Studies, 6: 21-50.

Hursh, B.; Haas, P. & Moore, M. (1983). An Interdisciplinary Model to Implement General Education. Journal of Higher Education, 54 (1): 42-59.

Klein, J., T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.

Klein, J. T., & Newell, W. H. (1997). Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies. In Jerry G. Gaff, James L. Ratcliff and Associates (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Comprehensive Guide to Purposes, Structures, Practices, and Change (pp. 393-415). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Klein, J. T. (2001). The Discourse of Transdisciplinarity: An Expanding Global Fieldand “The Dialogue Sessions [sole author]; “Why a Globalized World Needs Transdisciplinarity” [co-author]. In Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology and Society, ed. J. T. Klein, et al., pp. 25-34, 34-44. 103-16. Basel, Berlin, Boston: Birkhauser, 2001.

Klein, J. T., (Ed.). (2002). Interdisciplinary Education in K-12 and College: a foundation for K-16 dialogue.New York: The College Board.

Kockelmans, J. J. (1979a). Why interdisciplinarity.In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.),Interdisciplinarity and higher education(pp.123-160).University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

 Kocklemans, J. (Ed.) (1979b). Interdisciplinarity and HigherEducation, University Park: Pennsylvania State University.

Lattuca, L. (2001). Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Leucht S.; Kissling W. & Davis M. (2009). How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Psychiatr Scand.119 (6): 443 – 450.

Newell, William H. & William, J. Green (1982).Defining and Teaching Interdisciplinary Study. Improving College and University Teaching, 30.1 (Winter 1982), 23-30. Reprinted withpermission of the Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation.

Newell, W. H. (1994). Designing Interdisciplinary Courses. In Julie Thompson Klein and William G. Doty (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Studies Today (pp. 35-51). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Newell, W. H. (2001a). A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 125.

Newell, W. H. (2001b). Powerful Pedagogies. In Barbara Leigh Smith and John McCann (Eds.), Reinventing Ourselves: Interdisciplinary Education, Collaborative Leaning, and Experimentation in Higher Education (pp. 196-211). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

Newell, W. H. (2002). Integrating the College Curriculum, in Julie Thompson Klein, ed., Interdisciplinary Education in K-12 and College: A Foundation for K-16 Dialogue. New York: College Board.

Newell, W. (2005). Distinctive challenges of Library-Based Interdisciplinary research and Writing. Unpublished peper.

Newell, W. H. (2007). Decision Making in Interdisciplinary Studies. In Goktug Morcol (Ed.), Handbook of Decision Making (pp. 245-264). New York: Marcel-Dekker.

Nikitina, S. (2005). Pathways of Interdisciplinary Cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23 (3): 389-425.

Nikson, H & Fray, J. H. (1996). Sociology of Sport, USA: Wodswoeth.

Repko, A. F. (2005). Interdisciplinary Practice: A Student Guide to Research and Writing. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.

Repko, A. (2007a). Integrating Interdisciplinarity: How the Theories of Common Ground and Cognitive Interdisciplinarity are informing the Debate on Interdisciplinary Integration, Issues in Integrative Studies, 25: 1-31.

Repko, A.F. (2007b). Interdisciplinary curriculum design. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 130-137.

Repko, A. F. (2008a). Assessing interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 171-178.

Repko. A.F. (2008b). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Sage Publication, Inc

Seabury, M. B. (2004).Scholarship about interdisciplinarity: Some possibilities and guidelines. Issues in Integrative Studies, 22: 52-84.

Szostak, R. (2002). How to Do Interdisciplinarity: Integrating the Debate. Issues in Integrative Studies, 20:103-122.

Szostak, R. (2004). Classifying Science: Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method and Practice. Netherlands: Springer.

Tommerup, P. (2001). Learning to See Academic Culture through the Eyes of the Participants: An Ethnographic Approach to Analyzing and Assessing the Cultures of Alternative Institutions. In Barbara Leigh Smith and John McCann (Eds.), Reinventing Ourselves: Interdisciplinary Education, Collaborative Learning, and Experimentation in Higher Education (pp. 368-390). Bolton, Massachusetts: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

Wolfe, C. & Haynes, C. (2003) Interdisciplinary Writing Assessment Profiles. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21:126-169.