بررسی عوامل موثر بر کیفیت آموزش در دانشگاه فرهنگیان: پژوهشی پدیدارشناسانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

2 مدرس گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت آموزشی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان بوده است.
روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش حاضر پدیدارشناسی و میدان پژوهش شامل دانشجویان، اساتید، کارشناسان و مدیران دانشگاه فرهنگیان بود. شیوه گردآوری اطلاعات استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته بود. مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و با استفاده از قاعده رایج "اشباع نظری" در روش‌های کیفی انتخاب شدند. بدین ترتیب حجم مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش، شامل 21 نفر از اعضای میدان پژوهش بود. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات از الگوی چندمرحله‌ای کولایزی استفاده شد. جهت بررسی روایی داده­های حاصل از مصاحبه­ها نیز از دو معیار اعتبارپذیری و تأییدپذیری استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های پژوهش شامل 150 مفهوم فرعی، 19 مقوله اصلی و 7  مقوله محوری حاصل شدند. مقوله­های اصلی شامل گزینش مناسب استاد و دانشجو، صلاحیت حرفه‌ای اساتید، زیرساخت‌های فیزیکی، محتوای آموزشی مناسب تربیت ‌معلم، صلاحیت حرفه‌ای دانشجو معلمان، توانمندسازی اساتید و انگیزه بخشی به اساتید و دانشجویان بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه‌به یافته­های پژوهش فوق می‌توان به این نتیجه دست‌یافت که ارتقای کیفیت آموزش در دانشگاه فرهنگیان ماهیتی چندوجهی داشته و سرمایه‌گذاری هم‌زمان در این وجوه زمینه‌ساز ایجاد کیفیت آموزش است. کیفیت آموزش در  گرو آن است که دوقطبی‌هایی نظری یا عملی، محتوا محوری یا فعالیت محوری، تخصص یا تعهد و سلامت بدنی یا روانی باید در راستای تقویت کیفیت آموزش به‌گونه‌ای هماهنگ عمل نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Requirements of Effective Education in Farhangian University: (A Phenomenological Research)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojtaba Porkarimi 1
  • Omid Mehni 2
  • Taher Roshandel Arbatani 3
1 Assistant Professor Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
2 Lecturer of Elementary Education Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Business Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The present phenomenological study aimed to examine the factors affecting the quality of education at Farhangian University.
Methods: Therefore, semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect the information from 21 participants, including students, professors, experts, and managers of Farhangian University, who were selected using the purposive sampling method and theoretical saturation. Colaizzi's multistage method was used to analyze the data. Then, the validity and reliability of the study were examined.
Results: In the next stage, 150 sub-concepts, 19 main categories, and 7 major categories were obtained. The main categories comprised the appropriate selection of professors and students, the professional competence of professors, physical infrastructure, the appropriate educational content for teacher training, the professional competence of student teachers, the empowerment of professors, and motivating the professors and students.
Conclusion: The results showed that improving the quality of education at Farhangian University has a multifaceted nature, and paying attention to its different aspects can improve the quality of education. The quality of education depends on some dichotomies such as theory or practice, content or activity, expertise or commitment, and physical health or mental health. It can be improved if dichotomies work in a coordinated manner.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Quality of Education
  • Students
  • Professors
  • Farhangian University

مراجع

References

Alfy, S.E,. Abukari  A. (2019) Revisiting perceived service quality in higher education: uncovering service quality dimensions for postgraduate students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30 (1), 1-25.
Bagheri, K. (2015). A second look at Islamic education. Tehran. School publications.
Bloch, C., Degn, L., Nygaard, S., Haase, S. (2021). Does quality work work? A systematic review of academic literature on quality initiatives in higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46 (5), 701-718.
Brennan, J.(2018). Success factors of quality management in higher education: intended and unintended impacts. European Journal of Higher Education, 8 (3), 249-257.
Cardoso, S., Rosa M. J., Stensaker, B. (2015). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 41, 950-965.
Cheng, M. (2016). Quality in Higher Education. Published by: Sense Publishers,
Dehghan, A., Mahram, B., Karami, M. (2016). Evaluation of Curriculum in Teacher Training University in the Course of Training Teacher as Researcher: a Case Study of ShahidBeheshti and ShahidHasheminejadCampuses. Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 7(13), 78-100.
Dunworth, K., Sanchez, H. S.(2015). Perceptions of quality in staff-student written feedback in higher education: a case study. Teaching in Higher Education  Critical Perspectives, 21 (5), 576-589.
Harvey, L., Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen Years of Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 16 (1). 3-36.
Hasan Netaj, F; Taghipour Javan, A; Seyed Alipour, SA. (2014). Investigating effective factors in increasing the quality of teaching activities of Farhangian University professors in Mazandaran province. The first international conference on management, economics, accounting and educational sciences.
Hildesheim, C., Sonntag, K.(2019). The Quality Culture Inventory: a comprehensive approach towards measuring quality culture in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45 (4), 892-908.
Hooshisadast A, Rahimian H, Abbaspour A, Khorsandi A, Ghiasi Nodooshan S. (2018). Designing a lean university model for public universities (Case study: Farhangian Teacher Education University (FTEU)). Education Strategies in Medical Sciences ,11 (3) :132-141.
Hrnčiar, M., Madzík, P .(2017). A 3D view of issues of quality in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 28 (5-6), 633-662.
Jager, H. J. Nieuwenhuis De, F. J. (2005). Linkages Between Total Quality Management and the Outcomes‐based Approach in an Education Environment. Quality in Higher Education, 11 (3), 251-260.
Jarvis Darry, S.L. (2014)Regulating higher education: Quality assurance and neo-liberal managerialism in higher education—A critical introduction, Policy and Society, 33 (3), 155-166.
Jungblut, J., Vukasovic, M., Stensaker, B. (2014). Student perspectives on quality in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 5 (2), 157-180.
Jungblut, J., Vukasovic,. M., Stensaker, B. (2014). Student perspectives on quality in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education. 5 (2), 157-180
Kahloun, F., Ghannouchi, S. A. (2018). Evaluation of the Criteria and Indicators that Determine Quality in Higher Education: A Questionnaire Proposal. International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services.
Karami, Z., Dehbozorgi, J., Safarnavadeh, K. (2020). Analysis of writing skills in theachers of Persian language and literature Case Study:Farhangian University Internship Program. Teacher Professional Development, 5(3), 31-49.
Khadiv, A., Seyed Kalan, S. (2018). Affecting Factors on teaching quality in Farhangian University (Case Study: College of Ardabil). Educational and Scholastic studies, 7(1), 39-70.
Khorooshi, D., Parishani, N., Ghorbani, S. (2020). Investigating the problems of internship course from the perspective of Farhangian University teachers (Case study: Farhangian University of Isfahan). Research in Teacher Education(RTE), 3(1), 13-39.
Leiber, T. (2018). Impact evaluation of quality management in higher education: a contribution to sustainable quality development in knowledge societies. European Journal of Higher Education, 8 (3), 235-248.
Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., Harvey, L. C. (2018). Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: a SWOT analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3),1-15.
Letseka, M., Pitsoe, V. (2013). The challenges and prospects of access to higher education at UNISA.
Mengquan, L, Kai, C.,Gong, L. (2016). The Operation Mechanisms of External Quality Assurance Frameworks of Foreign Higher Education and Implications for Graduate Education. Chinese Education & Society, 49 (1-2), 72-85.
Nikkhah, M., Liaqtadar, M. (2017). Study of the quality of perfomance of the new elementary education curriculum of Farhangian University: Case study of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. Research in Teacher Education(RTE), 1(3), 105-134.
Pechmann Philipp, Haase Sanne (2020) How Policy Makers Employ the Term Quality in Higher Education Policymaking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66 (2), 355-366.
Qaramelki, A. F., Possession, Z., Mohadi, F. (2021). Professional ethics in school. Publications of Shahid Mahdavi Educational and Cultural Institute of Iran.
Rezaie A, Sharifi A, Etemad ahari A. (2021). Explaining the model of responsibility of the Faculty members of Farhangian University: A sequential explanatory mixed method. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 13 (6) :656-664.
Ross, W., De Rassenfosse, G., Jensen, P., Marginson, S. (2013). The determinants of quality national higher education systems. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35 (6), 599-611.
Seyfried, M., Pohlenz, P. (2018). Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness. European Journal of Higher Education, 8 (3), 258-271.
Shah, M,. McKay, J. (2018). Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education. Publisher ‏ : ‎ Palgrave Macmillan.
Singh, M.(2010). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Which Pasts to Build on, What Futures to Contemplate?, Quality in Higher Education, 16 (2) ,189-194.
Stella, A. (2006). Quality Assurance of Cross‐border Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 12 (3), 257-276.
Talkhabi M. (2019). Experienced curriculum of elementary education at Farhangian University of Tehran. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 6 (4), :59-72
Tsiligiris V., Hill, C. (2021). A prospective model for aligning educational quality and student experience in international higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46 (2), 228-244
Welch, E. H. (2011). Perspectives: Pursuing Quality in Higher Education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43 (1), 28-30.
Yingqiang, Z., Yongjian, S. (2016). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Reflection, Criticism, and Change. Chinese Education & Society, 49 (1-2), 7-19.
Zineldin, M., Hatice, A. C., Valentina,  V. (2011). Quality in Higher Education: New Criteria for Evaluating Students’ Satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 17 (2), 231-243.
نامه آموزش عالی
دوره 16، شماره 61
فروردین 1402
صفحه 99-120

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار